OpenSpec vs Spec Kit vs BMAD vs Kiro: Complete Comparison

Choosing the right spec-driven development tool can make or break your AI-assisted workflow. This comprehensive comparison helps you understand the differences, trade-offs, and when to use each tool.

Quick Comparison Table

Feature OpenSpec Spec Kit BMAD Kiro
Setup Time 5 minutes 30 minutes Hours/Days 15-20 minutes
Best For Existing codebases (brownfield) New projects (greenfield) Enterprise/complex projects AWS/Claude users
Complexity Low Medium High Medium
Workflow Steps 2-3 steps 4 steps Multi-agent Integrated
Dependencies Node.js only Python required Complex setup AWS account
Tool Lock-in None (20+ tools) None (tool-agnostic) None Claude models only
Output Verbosity Concise (~250 lines) Detailed (~800 lines) Very detailed Moderate
Learning Curve Gentle Moderate Steep Moderate

OpenSpec vs Spec Kit (GitHub)

OpenSpec

Advantages

  • Faster setup: 5 minutes vs 30 minutes. No Python required.
  • Concise output: ~250 lines vs ~800 lines. Easier to review.
  • Brownfield-friendly: Built for existing codebases, not just new projects.
  • Flexible workflow: Update any artifact anytime. No rigid phase gates.
  • Fewer commands: 3 AI commands vs 8. Simpler mental model.
  • Lightweight: Minimal overhead, maximum productivity.

Best For

  • Teams working on existing codebases
  • Developers who want speed and flexibility
  • Small to medium teams
  • Projects that need quick iteration

Spec Kit

Advantages

  • GitHub-backed: Official support and community.
  • Structured process: Clear separation between Product Owner and Developer roles.
  • Comprehensive documentation: Extensive specs and verification steps.
  • Greenfield optimized: Great for new projects from scratch.
  • Detailed guidance: Better for junior developers who need hand-holding.
  • Auto-branching: Automatically creates git branches.

Best For

  • New projects starting from scratch
  • Teams with clear role separation
  • Developers who want extensive documentation
  • Projects requiring strict compliance

When to Choose OpenSpec over Spec Kit:

  • You're working on legacy/existing code
  • You want faster iteration and less ceremony
  • You prefer concise, reviewable specs
  • You don't want to install Python
  • You value flexibility over structure

OpenSpec vs BMAD

OpenSpec

Advantages

  • Simple setup: 5 minutes vs hours/days for BMAD.
  • Low overhead: Minimal learning curve, immediate productivity.
  • Focused scope: Spec management, not full project management.
  • Tool-agnostic: Works with 20+ AI assistants.
  • Change-centric: Designed for incremental changes.

BMAD

Advantages

  • Multi-agent system: Simulates full agile team with different roles.
  • Complex projects: Handles enterprise-scale complexity better.
  • Architecture debates: AI agents can debate and refine architecture.
  • Multi-repo support: Works across different repositories.
  • Domain-agnostic: Works beyond just software development.

When to Choose OpenSpec over BMAD:

  • You want to get started quickly (not days of setup)
  • Your project complexity is manageable
  • You prefer simplicity over multi-agent orchestration
  • You're focused on code changes, not full project management
  • You work primarily in a single repository

When to Choose BMAD over OpenSpec:

  • Your project is genuinely enterprise-scale
  • You need full project management, not just specs
  • You have time to invest in learning a complex system
  • You work across multiple repositories
  • You need AI agents to debate architecture decisions

OpenSpec vs Kiro (AWS)

OpenSpec

Advantages

  • No vendor lock-in: Works with any AI tool, not just Claude.
  • Tool flexibility: Use Cursor, Copilot, Windsurf, or 17+ other tools.
  • No AWS dependency: Works anywhere, no cloud account needed.
  • Open source: MIT licensed, community-driven.
  • IDE agnostic: Not locked to a specific IDE.

Kiro

Advantages

  • AWS integration: Native integration with AWS services.
  • Powerful features: Advanced capabilities for complex workflows.
  • Enterprise support: AWS-backed enterprise support available.
  • Integrated IDE: Built into their IDE environment.

Limitations

  • Locked into Claude models only
  • Requires AWS account
  • Limited to their IDE
  • Vendor lock-in

When to Choose OpenSpec over Kiro:

  • You want to use tools other than Claude
  • You prefer not to be locked into AWS
  • You want to use your existing IDE (Cursor, VS Code, etc.)
  • You value open-source solutions
  • You want flexibility to switch tools

Decision Guide: Which Tool Should You Choose?

Choose OpenSpec If:

  • ✓ You're working on existing/legacy code (brownfield)
  • ✓ You want to get started in 5 minutes
  • ✓ You prefer concise, reviewable specs
  • ✓ You want flexibility to iterate freely
  • ✓ You use various AI tools (not just one)
  • ✓ You're a small to medium team
  • ✓ You value speed over comprehensive documentation
  • ✓ You don't want Python dependencies

Choose Spec Kit If:

  • ✓ You're starting a new project (greenfield)
  • ✓ You want GitHub-backed official support
  • ✓ You need clear role separation (PO vs Developer)
  • ✓ You want extensive documentation
  • ✓ You have junior developers who need guidance
  • ✓ You prefer structured, prescriptive workflows
  • ✓ You're okay with Python setup

Choose BMAD If:

  • ✓ Your project is genuinely enterprise-scale
  • ✓ You need full project management, not just specs
  • ✓ You work across multiple repositories
  • ✓ You have time to invest in learning
  • ✓ You need AI agents to debate architecture
  • ✓ You work beyond just software development

Choose Kiro If:

  • ✓ You're already using AWS and Claude
  • ✓ You want AWS-native integration
  • ✓ You're okay with vendor lock-in
  • ✓ You prefer their integrated IDE
  • ✓ You need enterprise AWS support

Real-World Insights

Setup Experience

OpenSpec: "Right off the bat, OpenSpec gave me a smoother onboarding experience. As someone who doesn't work with Python regularly, Spec Kit required me to install a newer package manager just to get started."

Spec Kit: Requires Python setup, which can be a barrier for JavaScript-focused teams.

Output Comparison

OpenSpec: Generated 3 files totaling ~250 lines for a feature change.

Spec Kit: Generated ~800 lines at the same stage. More comprehensive but harder to review quickly.

Workflow Speed

OpenSpec: "This execution was noticeably faster than Spec Kit's implementation phase, likely due to less noise in the spec files and fewer tasks to process."

Spec Kit: More thorough but slower due to additional verification steps.

Brownfield vs Greenfield

OpenSpec: Purpose-built for existing codebases. "OpenSpec is built for brownfield projects, not just greenfield."

Spec Kit: Optimized for new projects from scratch.

Conclusion

The choice between OpenSpec, Spec Kit, BMAD, and Kiro depends heavily on your team structure, project type, and working style:

  • For most teams working on existing code: OpenSpec offers the best balance of speed, flexibility, and ease of use.
  • For new projects with clear roles: Spec Kit provides structure and comprehensive documentation.
  • For enterprise-scale complexity: BMAD handles multi-agent orchestration and complex scenarios.
  • For AWS/Claude-focused teams: Kiro offers native integration but with vendor lock-in.

The reality is that modern AI-driven development workflows are still evolving. All these tools represent different philosophies about how to integrate AI into software development. Your choice should align with your team's experience level, project type, and preferred working style.

Ready to Try OpenSpec?

Get started in 5 minutes with our getting started guide.